 |
|
Chapter 1 – Introduction to the Cleveland Bay Consortium
and the Cleveland Bay Status Report
The Cleveland Bay Consortium is an informal industry/research
forum for the discussion of the sustainable use of the environments of Cleveland
Bay. Industry and regulatory agencies in the Cleveland Bay region have identified
a need for comprehensive information about water, sediment, flora and fauna
of the Bay for environmental license applications and future planning for sustainable
use of the region. Information from past research is often difficult to find,
of variable quality, and is sometimes difficult to apply to current problems
and applications. Business, industry, regulatory authorities, and research agencies
identified a need for a focus or forum to exchange information, priorities,
information needs, and expertise.
The first Cleveland Bay Consortium workshop was held in January
1998. The founding members of the CBC included, BHP Cannington, the Australian
Institute of Marine Science, MIM Copper Refineries, Northern Shipping and Stevedoring,
the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Sun Metals, Townsville Port Authority,
James Cook University, QNI.
All participants agreed that, it is often difficult to determine
environmental monitoring requirements, licensing and discharge criteria when
there appears to be a general lack of baseline data. The fact of the matter
however, is that Cleveland Bay has been extensively studied and there is significant
data available on the natural resources and processes of the region. The challenge
however has been in identifying these research initiatives, where the data is
held and coordinating these initiatives to ensure that the data is available
in a single location, or at least to initiate this process. It was important
from the outset to recognise the benefits to industry, research organisations
and regulatory agencies a like ensuring data availability, efficiencies in research
initiatives and improved environmental understanding.
Figure 1.
Location plan of Cleveland Bay showing the Cities of Townsville and Thuringowa
located on the western shores, and the boundaries of the World Heritage Area.
This Cleveland Bay Status Report is the first step in providing
the information and understanding of all the stakeholders of Cleveland Bay.
An exercise of this complexity requires the input from a range of groups and
individuals. The commitment by the contributors demonstrates a desire to ensure
the sustainable use of Cleveland Bay.
This report is not intended to pass judgement on the quality
of Cleveland Bay nor is it intended to comment on the quality of the available
data. Rather, the Report is a compilation of all the available research data
relevant to Cleveland Bay and the region. The report itself has been compiled
through the voluntary contributions of individuals and organisations representing
researchers, industry and regulatory authorities. To minimise the burden on
participating agencies the forum has been established electronically, allowing
anyone with a relevant interest to contribute and participate.
The Cleveland Bay Sustainability Cycle
The Cleveland Bay Sustainability
Cycle, represented in figure 1, depicts the journey to the bsustainable use
of Cleveland Bay.
By sustainable use, we mean, that
the things that we do in Cleveland Bay today will not have a detrimental impact
on the Cleveland Bay such that futures generations will be unable to do the
things in Cleveland Bay that they want to do.
In 1996 a group of people representing
industry, research and regulators got together to talk about our vision for
Cleveland Bay. This group also discussed their interest and activity in the
Bay. What was lacking previously in Cleveland Bay was a coherent vision and
understanding of the links between the different values of Cleveland Bay.
What are the links between the air,
the water, the sediment, the plants and the animals of Cleveland Bay? And what
are the relationships between these internal contributors (ie nature) to Cleveland
Bay and the external factors eg people and their activities?
The group then formed the Cleveland
Bay Consortium and set out to answer some of these questions.
The journey of understanding has
only just begun and this status report is a tangible contributor to the Cleveland
Bay Sustainability Cycle .
The symbolism of the circle sizes in figure 1, at
the entry point of the Cleveland Bay Consortium into the Cleveland Bay Sustainability
Cycle reflects the ‘steps’ that are needed for our journey. They represent the
incremental increase in knowledge, understanding, acceptance, contribution,
commitment, honesty and integrity as we journey to our next milestone of the
“Gap analysis”. All the journeys in the Cleveland Bay Sustainability Cycle reflect
the same stepping-stones. On completion of the Gap analysis, further research
or understanding will need to be conducted to increase our knowledge of the
environmental, social and economic vales of Cleveland Bay. This is often referred
to as the triple bottom line of sustainable development – of people, planet
and profit or earth, earthlings and earnings.
As we increase our knowledge we move
on to the next stage of the journey. That is to adopt principle, practices and
standards (or if necessary, regulation/legislation) that reflect our new knowledge.
That is not the end of the journey
– the Cleveland Bay Sustainability Cycle is an endless cycle.
Sustainable development, we believe,
means different things to different people, in different times. The vision of
sustainable use however, should not change – it just gets its values redefined.
Hence the next step in this never-ending
journey is to conduct another status report and start the cycle again.
The level to which we can manage
Cleveland Bay is directly proportional to our understanding of Cleveland Bay.
The more we know, the better we can manage. The better we can manage, the more
sustainable is our use.
Figure 1.2
Flow chart demonstrating how the Cleveland Bay Consortium and Cleveland Bay
Status Report, interact with environmental pressures and the objective of sustainable
use of Cleveland Bay.
Table 1.1 Structure of the Cleveland Bay Status Report |
|
Chapter Subject |
Title |
Authors |
1 |
Introduction |
Introduction to the Cleveland Bay Consortium and the Cleveland Bay Status
Report |
C. Anderson & M. Roche |
2 |
The Physical Environment |
Weather and Climate of Cleveland Bay |
J. Lough |
|
|
Water and Sediment Movement in Cleveland Bay |
P. Ridd & A. Orpin |
|
|
Geological and sedimentary characteristics of Cleveland Bay |
R. M. Carter & P. Larcombe |
3 |
Marine Biodiversity |
Cleveland Bay Biodiversity |
C. Battershill, G. Ericson & E. Evansillidge |
4 |
Industry |
Industries and the environment in the Townsville Region |
Greg Doherty, Vern Vietch, Mick Roche, Caryn Anderson |
5 |
Regulatory |
Environmental laws and regulations applicable to Cleveland Bay |
A. Hesse |
6 |
Toxicology |
Chemical Contaminants in Cleveland Bay: Water Quality and Ecotoxicological
Issues |
G.B. Jones, A. J. Reichelt-Brushett, A. Muslim, P. Mercurio, G. Doherty
& D. Haynes |
7 |
Environmental Quality |
Summary of investigations into marine environmental quality and air quality
of Cleveland Bay |
G. Doherty, J. Cruz, K. Neil & D. Haynes |
8 |
Conclusions and Recommendations |
|
C. Anderson & M. Roche |
|